Founders Box — Fundraising Cockpit (Phase 1)
A documented, developer-ready Airtable schema and Softr app architecture (ERD, table/field definitions, wireframes, visibility/role model, automation opportunities and a prioritized Phase 1–3 backlog) enabling a 2-day Phase-1 build for founder-facing fundraising cockpits.

The problem
Design and deliver a clean, extensible Airtable + Softr architecture for Crampton Partners to run CRM, client-facing portals, investor targeting pipelines and event/activity tracking — including a prioritized Phase 1 build that a developer can implement in a 2-day sprint and a roadmap for Phases 2–3.
What we built
Purpose: Audit existing Airtable bases (anonymised if needed) and deliver a simple, scalable operational architecture that supports investor targeting pipelines, activity tracking, founder dashboards, and future cohort/mentor features.
Deliverables (Phase 1 architecture sprint):
• ERD diagram showing entities and relationships.
• Clean Airtable schema (recommended 5 core tables: companies, investor\_firms, investor\_contacts, company\_investor\_targets, progress\_updates) with field types, primary keys, lookup/rollup strategy and sample rows.
• Softr app wireframe and page tree (Founder interface + Admin interface), user roles & permissions, visibility rules, and definition of editable vs read-only fields.
• Data flow map and recommended automation touchpoints (Make/Zapier) and minimal API/CustomJS patterns for integration.
• 1–2 page architecture summary and a prioritized backlog split into Phase 1 (must-have), Phase 2 (near term enhancements) and Phase 3 (scale/features).
• Developer checklist for a 2-day build (Day 1: core schema + relationships + sample data; Day 2: founder & admin interfaces, save views, polish).
Scope / Constraints:
Phase 1 focuses on an MVP fundraising cockpit (founder dashboard, pipeline Kanban, investor details, recent activity, add target/log update actions). It intentionally excludes cohorts, mentors/permissions model, staging/normalisation tables, advanced automations, and narrative tagging — these are scoped for later phases so Phase 1 remains deliverable in ~11–14 developer hours.
Expected Outcome:
A production-ready architecture that the client team can either build themselves from the provided checklist and assets or retain the architect to implement. The schema is Postgres-ready to support future migration to Supabase/Postgres if required.


Topics
- Coaching, Consulting & Professional Services
- Airtable
- Softr
- HubSpot
- Google Sheets
- Make (Integromat)
- Professional Services
- Client Portals
This was a client portal development build. See what a build like this costs, or hire a Softr developer to do the same for you.
Want something like this?
Tell us what you're building. First conversation is on us. Fixed quote in 24 hours, mutual NDA signed on request.
.png&w=1920&q=75)









